16 Following


Currently reading

Rainbow Rowell
Fic: Why Fanfiction is Taking Over the World
Christina Lauren, Lev Grossman, Tiffany Reisz, Rachel Caine, Jen Zern, Heidi Tandy, Rukmini Pande, Samira Nadkarni, Wendy C. Fries, Jolie Fontenot, Randi Flanagan, Tish Beaty, Cyndy Aleo, V. Arrow, Brad Bell, Andrew Shaffer, Darren Wershler, Anne Jamison, Jules Wilkinson, R
The Outsiders - S.E. Hinton I decided a couple of months ago that I would read The Outsiders during Banned Books Week this year. The book was a re-read for me--for the first time in decades. One of the things I appreciate about Banned Books Week is that it gives me an excuse to revisit old, long-neglected book friends. That said, I can't say I appreciate that some of those old book friends are perennially challenged...but at least they haven't faded away.

I've always marveled at the fact that Susan Hinton was still in high school herself when she wrote this--and I still think that's pretty impressive. In fact, I don't think I realized in my earlier, younger readings just how accomplished the writing in this novel is. That said, in reading it again several decades away from high school, I find that the plot feels more like something conceived by an adolescent. I was actually surprised by how much of it I'd forgotten, and how much of it is high melodrama.

What I did remember about The Outsiders -the characters and the emotions--still holds up, and remains surprisingly relevant despite time-specific details like "semi-Beatle haircuts" and hair oil and "rumbles." I can see the reasons the novel continues to be controversial--among them, it's deeply violent and lacking in effective parental figures. But I also see its virtues, and one of its greatest is a strong moral center. Between the lines, Hinton's characters are complex, and the relationships she depicts among the Curtis brothers and their gang--goofy names and all--are grounded in genuine feeling.

The Outsiders was one of the earliest significant young-adult novels, and forty-five years after its original publication, I think it's still significant--and only partly because of it controversial nature. But if the controversy it provokes helps keep it significant--and therefore keep it in the hands of readers--it's worth taking on the challengers.